![]() THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN SITUATIONS OF OCCUPATION. THE ISSUES OF THE LEX SPECIALIS NATURE OF IHL WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF POTENTIALLY LETHAL FORCE AND THE PARALLEL APPLICABILITY OF HRL AND IHL. H OW DETAILED ARE THE HRL RULES ON THE USE OF POTENTIALLY LETHAL FORCE?. S TATE PRACTICE: WIDESPREAD AND GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE APPLICABILITY OF HRL IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT AND OCCUPATION. ![]() C ONCEPTUAL DIFFICULTIES IN APPLYING HRL TREATIES IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT AND OCCUPATION. C ASE- LAW OF THE I NTERNATIONAL C OURT OF J USTICE ON THE APPLICABILITY OF HRL IN SITUATIONS OF ARMED CONFLICT AND OCCUPATION. 10Ĭ) The Inter-American Commission and Court of Human Rights. O VERVIEW OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THESE THREE MAJOR HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES. R ELEVANT ISSUES ADDRESSED BY THREE MAJOR HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES. T HE LAW ENFORCEMENT MODEL: NECESSITY, PROPORTIONALITY AND THE OBLIGATION TO ARREST WHERE POSSIBLE. HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ON THE RIGHT TO LIFE AND THE USE OF POTENTIALLY LETHAL FORCE.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |